When will ever SQX & TradeStation Synchronization between strategies results be solved?

When will ever SQX & TradeStation Synchronization between strategies results be solved?,

This problem exist scene TradeStation was introduced in SQX,


• Some strategies results does not match TradeStation backtested results,

• Some strategies that are developed with 200 max bars back got insufficient max bars back error in TradeStation..

• Strategies results with Data2 (2nd TimeFrame for example D1 and Main as M15) are not the same
6. Subcharts support is still in development
We focused on single-chart strategies in the implementation of Tradestation / MultiCharts testing engine.
Strategies that use multiple charts (Data2, Data3 etc. in EasyLanguage) weren’t yet tested in StrategyQuant for match – they might and might not work.
We will be focusing on this in the next builds.

• Higher testing precision
7. Higher testing precision is still in the development
Right now, it is possible to use Tradestation / MultiCharts testing engine with ‘Selected Timeframe’ testing precision.  This is sufficient for all types of orders – market, stop, limit. Tradestation / MultiCharts work reliably with this kind of test precision, and it can be used in live trading.
We are working on adding also better precision modes, they will be added in one of the future builds.

https://strategyquant.com/doc/strategyquant/reliable-backtesting-in-tradestation-multicharts/
Last updated on April 29, 2019...., 2019..!

• etc..

its been years now =/

Still TradeStation users are frustrated for years with the limitation of its 32bit application (up to 4GBs of ram usage),
it would be a huge advantage if this problem be fixed, just like with MT4 where it is only limited to 1 core optimization and lack of robustness features,
TS got more to offer but it is limited.., its very slow..
Attachments
No attachments
  • Votes +15
  • Project StrategyQuant X
  • Type Bug
  • Status Archived
  • Priority Normal
  • Assignee Mark Fric
  • Milestone Build 137

History

k
#1

Karish

03.03.2023 12:31

Task created

k
#2

Karish

03.03.2023 12:31
Voted for this task.
l
#3

Loonly

03.03.2023 12:44
Voted for this task.
KB
#4

kbtech

03.03.2023 17:44
Voted for this task.
b
#5

beppil

05.03.2023 09:45
Voted for this task.
CG
#6

Chris G

05.03.2023 17:25
Voted for this task.
b
#7

binhsir

12.03.2023 04:15
Voted for this task.
b
#8

binhsir

12.03.2023 04:21
I have also submitted requirements for high precision backtest in MC/TS ,  Once you use keyword setstoploss, It is very necessary to make high-precision backtest.What's more, in MC, you can also force the use IntrabarOrderGeneration.

By the way, MC support 64bit. As a trading platform, MC is better than TS. Of course you need to buy a license.

k
#9

Karish

12.03.2023 11:17
binhsir,

yeah I agree with you, when i am using my TS strategies i always use LIBB (Looking-inside-bar Backtesting), in most cases i get totally different results when using sensitive rules like you said setstoploss entry at stop orders etc..


Thanks for replying too :)

i hope the devs will catch on to this :/

E
#10

Emmanuel

15.03.2023 13:56
Voted for this task.
DR
#11

mentaledge

17.03.2023 15:09
Voted for this task.
r
#12

Rio

20.03.2023 22:51
Voted for this task.
k
#13

Karish

05.04.2023 15:23
Bump
FD
#14

innggo

05.04.2023 18:20
Voted for this task.
EM
#15

EDAU87

08.04.2023 17:27
Voted for this task.
AF
#16

Aj

25.04.2023 08:36
Voted for this task.
MF
#17

Mark Fric

04.05.2023 10:57

Assignee changed from Mark Fric to Mark Fric

Status changed from New to Archived

Milestone changed from None to Build 137

closing this, there is no strategy attached. We havediscord group to discuss the differences
4
#18

Jordan

02.11.2023 14:09
Voted for this task.

Votes: +15

Drop files to upload

or

choose files

Max size: 5MB

Not allowed: exe, msi, application, reg, php, js, htaccess, htpasswd, gitignore

...
Wait please