I tested the same strategy again in the latest version of SQ.
The results are completely different than in the previous version of the program.
Attachment 116126.png added
Attachment 211190.png added
Attachment 241119.png added
Attachment settings_Data.png added
I tested the same time interval (H1). On the same currency pair. Below are the time frame settings and several test results on other strategies. The results are very strange.
It seems that MC tests in 118 work properly.
The settings were too harsh because the strategies did not pass the tests or the strategies were weak. I also made a mistake in the Data, Test parameters settings. In this case, "Selected timeframe only (fasted)" should be selected. Thank you all for help in finding the cause.I have the same problem, also with H1 timeframe.
About the remark: " selected timeframe should be selected" Could you explain this?
HIGHEST XXX will be the same, etc. etc.
some indicators with high periods can behave the same, because averaging will cut off the differencies
Correct me if I am wrong but the ultimate way of testing would be to use tick data right?
If this is the best way then good models would pass the Retest method as well with tickdata because this would resemble live trading, however there is a big difference in 117 and 118. All my models don't survive version 118 however they make money during real live trading. So I think there is something wrong with version 118.
Results are not bad with retesting but really realy bad just like the pictures above send in.....