Please make sure that TS 10 is supported properly.

Im all in for that.., already uploaded some tasks stating those issues with SQX vs TS backtests aint matching..,

TS 9.5 & TS 10 might have the same backtesting engine (maybe just a faster engine) but should be identical because the users would have gone mad about it if there ware any differences,

So i think the same out-put of EL code will work the same on TS 9.5 & TS 10,

More users are going to use TS 10 because of the new look and more newbie friendly so i would keep that in mind if i was in the SQ Dev team position.

can you attach some SQX strategy that produces different results in TS 9.5 and TS 10?

Best regards,

Tomas

I have backtested your strategy both in SQ and TS10 and I got matching results. 

I noticed that the strategy uses very high indicators periods. It may take a while until it stabilizes, so I reserved 1000 bars.

I don't think there is some backtest engine difference between TS9 and TS10.

In your docx file I can see that you haven't applied the EOF in your project config, this can be the cause of the differences.

Also it depends on your data, but I had to set ticksize to 0.01 in SQ. My @ES data downloaded from TS10 don't have min move 25 but 1 when I take a look on the candles.

Best regards,

Tomas