Strategies attached.
Please check and fix.
Thanks
Attachment JforexSQX07926.sqa added
Attachment Strategy 0792671 - Optimization 028914.sqx added
Attachment Strategy_0_792671_Optimization_0_28_914_02122020_122330.html added
1) I've downloaded and install patch to SQX 130 dev2
2) Yes, I've used QA to compare backtest. Merged sqa file attached. As well as sqx and HTML files of both backtests.
3)You can find Jforex backtest settings here in a short video https://www.screencast.com/t/ZMAsUSh9
4) I use both dukascopy data from Jforex and SQX as Duksacopy is my broker.
still something wrong
Then the backtests almost match but there are still some differences. I will dig deeper .... and let you know.
Attachment image-0.png added
Attachment tickpStrategy 0792671 - Opti.sqx added
my bad I've missed precision settings but....
I can not say that jforex matches sqx with Real tick. Moreover, I can say that difference between selected timeframe and real tick is not substantial BUT...
If we compare with Jforex it is.
I've attached screenshot with selected timeframe sqx, real tick sqx and jforex here.
For your convenience, I've also added tick precise sqx file.
Status changed from New to Fixed
There can be still some differences in backtests. Please read post here https://strategyquant.com/doc/strategyquant/reliable-backtesting-in-jforex/
Please download the patch from the task below and test it out
https://roadmap.strategyquant.com/tasks/sq4_7357
Are you using QuantAnalyzer for comparing the backtests ?
If yes, can you please also attach a portfolio sqa (merged html jforex + sqx) file next time ?
Additionally can you provide more info about the backtest settings in JForex ? Would be great to have a printscreen of History Tester tab
Did you export historical data from jforex to SQX to get the same result?