Project - number of ACCEPTED vs. RETESTED different

Hello

I see, that the accepted and the retested numbers differ in my project. I just wanted to mention this.

Brg. :Csaba
Attachments
Diff.png
(209.01 KiB)
  • Votes 0
  • Project StrategyQuant X
  • Type Bug
  • Status Fixed
  • Priority Normal

History

l
#1

Csaba

27.08.2019 12:06

Task created

TB
#2

Tomas Brynda

27.08.2019 13:41

Status changed from New to Waiting for information

Hello Csaba,

was the input databank of Retest task empty?

l
#3

Csaba

31.08.2019 00:35

Attachment Diff numbers in databanks during running project.png added

Hi Tomas

Yes, everything was empty.
UPDATE: in the SQX 123 I have the same problem. I just updated the SQX and started the project from zero. Please see the attachment.

Brg.: Csaba
TB
#4

Tomas Brynda

02.09.2019 09:39

Status changed from Waiting for information to In progress

TT
#5

Tamas

02.09.2019 10:36

Attachment Diff numbers in databanks during running project.png added

Csaba can you please attach the text log from UI?
l
#6

Csaba

02.09.2019 11:17

Attachment diff2.png added

Attachment log.txt added

Hello Tamás :)

Sure. Here you are. However I am running actually a new project, but the difference is there. I attached a new screenshot too and copied the project flow log of this project at the same time.
Than kyou!

Brg: Csaba
TT
#7

Tamas

02.09.2019 12:15

Attachment dbbb7a60c7c6001.png added

There were some strategies accepted(strategies which passed the filters) but not saved to the databank.

Reasons are "replaced with better strategy" or "too similar strategy in databank"


We will add also accepted details to the text log so it will be clear for the next time. 


For now it is logged only in UI ....showed on the printscreen


l
#8

Csaba

02.09.2019 12:31
Okay, thank you very much!
TT
#9

Tamas

11.09.2019 09:13

Status changed from In progress to Fixed


Votes: 0

Drop files to upload

or

choose files

Max size: 5MB

Not allowed: exe, msi, application, reg, php, js, htaccess, htpasswd, gitignore

...
Wait please