Update 1: changing to bug because I was told it is supposed to be measured in ticks and not dollars. I don't know if the actual calculation is wrong or if it is just being displayed incorrectly. This screenshot is in the builder section under data. Please give clarification.
Update 2: It looks like this only shows up as $ instead of ticks when using the MultiCharts engine in the builder.
Description changed:
Edit: changing to bug because I was told it is supposed to be measured in ticks and not dollars. I don't know if the actual calculation is wrong or if it is just being displayed incorrectly. This screenshot is in the builder section under data. Please give clarification.
Subject changed from Measure slippage in ticks and not dollars to 129 dev 6 Measure slippage in ticks and not dollars
Attachment slip.jpg added
PIP is not the same as TICK - TICK is the smallest move
for currencies 10 TICKS = 1 PIP
Also I am trading futures so are you saying for futures it is a whole point?
for these engines i dont know how the slippage is working - but futures has min. step mostly 0.25, am i right? i dont trade them, only tried some US indices strats, but only for MT5 netted engine
Status changed from New to Refused
Attachment Screen Shot 2020-08-06 at 75526 PM.png added
1. Is this $ per standard lot/contract?
2. If it is measured in $ here, are you using ticks or $ for the monte carlo simulation where it says "Randomize slippage from 0 to 5" because if its $5, this is much less than one tick on most futures and would not give the same type test of that forex strategies do. If this is measured in ticks not $, then why not expose this variable to the user to use for the build process?