MM - Size if no MM

Why is there such a huge difference in the result of changing only Sice if noMM which is not backtest used at the time?
Attachments
Screenshot_2.png
(158.72 KiB)
Strategy 2381951.sqx
(100.74 KiB)
Screenshot_1.png
(178.41 KiB)
Strategy 238195.sqx
(100.43 KiB)
  • Votes 0
  • Project StrategyQuant X
  • Type Bug
  • Status Refused
  • Priority Normal

History

Rr
#1

Partizanas

16.08.2020 16:47

Task created

Rr
#2

Partizanas

16.08.2020 17:26

Subject changed from MM - Sice if no MM to MM - Size if no MM

h
#3

hankeys

16.08.2020 18:45

Attachment sorting.jpg added

sorting.jpg
(398.25 KiB)
because you are hitted with the biggest SL with biggest open order


and i found bug when sorting by the size column, its not sorted properly

Rr
#4

Partizanas

16.08.2020 20:21
but MM using risk fixed % of amount. size if no MM,will be totaly disable.
MF
#5

Mark Fric

17.08.2020 11:18

Status changed from New to Refused

it is simple, there is a Size if no MM used in these backtests.


You use money management based on account balance and when the balance gets very small then the trade size computed by risk would be 0. Then Size if no MM is used.


You should increase your initial capital to avoid this.



Votes: 0

Drop files to upload

or

choose files

Max size: 5MB

Not allowed: exe, msi, application, reg, php, js, htaccess, htpasswd, gitignore

...
Wait please