Ability to Automatically Apply the parameters of a specific cell in a WF Matrix to the WF Strategy

Could you please add a feature to automatically apply the parameters from a cell in a WF matrix to a WF strategy? The must be a configuration on which cell and row will be use to apply the parameters to a WF strategy.
For example, I have a 5 x 5 WF matrix. If I want to automatically apply the optimized parameter of cell 3/row 3, I will define the row # and cell # in the new WFM setting, At the end of WFM run, the setting will be automatically applied to the WF strategy.

2/ This feature would be really useful, but there is let say suboptimal simplification in marking the best runs/%OOS cluster. If there is multiple best candidates (e.g. 7/9 passed twice) it will automatically chose the one which is closest to the top left corner. So if there is full matrix od passed clusters, the winner always be cluster [2,2] no matter if matrix is 4x4 or 10x10.
It would be better if there is multiple winners, chose the best not because it is closer to top left, but because it has better parameters e.g. better Stability of RDD (which calculation is also bugged: tasks/sq4_8594), or at least Stability of NP.

Could you please add a feature to automatically apply the parameters from a cell in a WF matrix to a WF strategy? The must be a configuration on which cell and row will be use to apply the parameters to a WF strategy.
For example, I have a 5 x 5 WF matrix. If I want to automatically apply the optimized parameter of cell 3/row 3, I will define the row # and cell # in the new WFM setting, At the end of WFM run, the setting will be automatically applied to the WF strategy.

2/ This feature would be really useful, but there is let say suboptimal simplification in marking the best runs/%OOS cluster. If there is multiple best candidates (e.g. 7/9 passed twice) it will automatically chose the one which is closest to the top left corner. So if there is full matrix od passed clusters, the winner always be cluster [2,2] no matter if matrix is 4x4 or 10x10.
It would be better if there is multiple winners, chose the best not because it is closer to top left, but because it has better parameters e.g. better Stability of RDD (which calculation is also bugged: tasks/sq4_8594), or at least Stability of NP.
Long story short: Pls. in particular add option how decide which cluster is the best, in case there are more than 1 cluster which passed criterias. See attached pic.